One of the big themes in the President's campaign for the office was the fact that he intended to ensure that our neighbors to the south helped us with the cost of securing that border.

I have introduced a bill recently called the Border Wall Funding Act, which would assess a 2 percent fee on remittances from the United States to countries in South America.

It appears that he has had success with solid fuel ballistic missiles, including those launched by submarines and on the ground.

There is virtually no schedule margin between legacy system age out and the deployment of modernized replacement systems.

The last Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) was published 7 years ago. The world was very different in 2010, particularly when talking about Russia.

Secretary Moniz tasked this study as part of the Department's mission to ensure an effective U.S. nuclear deterrent through the application of science, technology and engineering.

We estimate that an additional $5.2 over the fiscal year 2018 through 2021 is needed.

CBO has recently estimated the cost of sustaining, operating, and modernizing our nuclear deterrent to be $400 billion over the next 10 years.

Looking at the Trump administration's FY18 budget request for DOD nuclear forces and NNSA's nuclear weapons activities, is there more consistency between the Obama administration's plans, or more difference?

The bad idea fairy seems to visiting some folks in this town and proposing that we should defer spending on the LRSO and GBSD programs until the Nuclear Posture Review is complete.

General Rand, can you commit that you will make it clear to the entire Air Force that anyone who attempts to interfere with the acquisition of this capability will have absolute hell to pay?

What would be the consequences, risks, or benefits of delaying or cancelling key nuclear modernization programs?