Yes. You know, there's a consequence so overtime for this and some notion that there isn't. So your credibility starts to erode.

I don't think it's the end of the world. I just don't think it's a great idea. It's going to cost a lot of money.

Do you believe that the 6 or 7 percent of our defense budget that we are devoting to the nuclear enterprise is an adequate level of spending?

The last Nuclear Posture Review published 8 years ago said, quote: 'Russia is not an enemy and is increasingly a partner,' close quote.

If there are allegations that the FBI perjured themselves in an affidavit to a judge for a FISA court, both Republicans and Democrats should be upset about that.

I don't think any committee -- any member of that committee should have voted on that until they all read the underlying intelligence information based on the memo.

The FBI is not immune to oversight and they absolutely should be held to account -- if they did those things.

If they believed that the FBI did this which I argue as a criminal offense if you purposely misled the judge in a FISA court, somebody needs to go to jail.

I'm a little bit at lost here. I don't understand what they're trying to accomplish by a memo.

I think Republicans are making a serious mistake here, getting a FISA order is a very complicated process and it involves a lot of people.

What they're doing is, these aren't investigations anymore, these are campaigns, extensions of campaign.

This is an area that we have spent a lot of time on in the Committee on Homeland Security over several years, and I can state without equivocation that there is no technology that is more effective at detecting explosives in our…