Don't you think you had the obligation to tell the American people that we're going to put you in the system, but beware, your information is likely to be vulnerable?

You accepted a risk on behalf of every user of this computer that put their personal financial information at risk.

Before I go to my colleague from Arizona, General Kehler, do you believe the B61 nuclear bombs serve a military purpose in Europe?

Do you believe our extended deterrent assurances to allies lose credibility if we continue to slip deadlines for modernizing our stockpile?

At this time, I have no further requests to speak, so I am prepared to close with an urging to my colleagues that they vote in favor of this bill. I yield back the balance of my time.

We have heard from various disarmament advocates that the B61 LEP is premised on a number of assumptions that may be outdated.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

a. NNSA's final cost estimate for the B61-12 LEP came in at around $8 billion.

Would it be fair to say that the White House should know what those collection priorities are?

These four retired senior officers eloquently summarized why cuts to the B61 LEP... would not only harm the U.S. deterrent, but also have major negative impacts on our allies and our nonproliferation goals.

It is time to leave aside the misinformation and fantasy that has seeped into the public debate, and deal with the real world.

Would you please describe how CAPE arrived at this number?