I thought maybe, if anybody is still listening, we would talk a little bit about the intent of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. I hope maybe we can clarify some of the misunderstandings. First, I believe that when the distinguished Senator from California, a valued member of the committee, Mrs. Feinstein, spoke on the origins of FISA, she correctly noted that it was created, at least in part, in response to the disclosed abuses of domestic national security surveillance. However, as the legislative history makes clear, FISA was never intended to regulate the acquisition of the contents of international or foreign communications where the contents are acquired by intentionally targeting a particular known U.S. person who is in the United States. The legislative history states: This bill does not afford protections to U.S. persons who are abroad, nor does it regulate the acquisition of the contents of international communications of U.S. persons who are in the United States, where the contents are acquired unintentionally.
On the recordJanuary 29, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the intent and legislative history of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Share
More from Julian Bond
Jun 19, 2008
Let me explain briefly that we added one sentence to a two-sentence amendment saying, in essence, that it will not affect the GSEs, existing affordable housing programs. Those are programs already in effect. There was some question about…
May 9, 2012
Full equality, it means enjoying all of the rights that everybody else in the country enjoys.
Jun 26, 2008
I know this is morning business, but I need to get people's attention back on FISA, I hope. Let me clarify some things that have been said earlier today. From time to time, some have tried to rewrite the history on what happened 1 year ago…





