Let me explain briefly that we added one sentence to a two-sentence amendment saying, in essence, that it will not affect the GSEs, existing affordable housing programs. Those are programs already in effect. There was some question about whether they would be affected. The amendment makes clear what was implied. I expect that one will find no change in it. In any event, that is not the point. The point is to remove the tax the Banking Committee provided, which is a tax on GSEs which, without any input or other involvement, would pay support for a whole range of groups. There are many groups, such as ACORN and others who build low-income housing. Who knows, it might even be Habitat for Humanity. But they would be able to use these funds to provide soft costs to support the programs and other related costs. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should be able to continue to use their existing affordable housing program that they administer, that they were set up to do, and not have their funds taken away to fund another program over which they have no control, no responsibility. There is absolutely no reason to tax these entities to support housing groups which may or may not be responsible or capable of administering good housing programs. There will also be additional economic risks to Fannie and Freddie, depending on the use of these funds and the quality of the groups which receive these funds.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to GSEs and affordable housing programs.
Share
More from Julian Bond
We ought to be happy that other people, including gays and lesbians, and many other people have imitated the black movement for human rights.
Gay and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn't 'special' to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship.
Well, I think it is. I mean any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.
The bill we passed in the Senate with an overwhelming bipartisan majority protected civil liberties of American citizens much further than they have ever been protected even under existing criminal law, we provided more protection. The…





