Our Congress has voted not long ago overwhelmingly that marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman.
Jeff Sessions
The Public Record
Jeff Sessions is an American politician and lawyer who served as the 84th Attorney General of the United States from 2017 to 2018. A member of the Republican Party, he was previously a U.S. Senator from Alabama from 2007 to 2017. During his tenure in the Senate, Sessions was known for his strong stance on immigration and law enforcement issues, advocating for stricter immigration policies and supporting various measures to combat drug trafficking and crime. He also served as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama from 2001 to 2002.
I think it does amount to a redefinition of marriage, contrary to what the Congress has explicitly stated.
By creating a new and a legally tenuous, I suggest, definition of 'permanent partnership,' we would be expanding the avenue for fraud and abuse.
How about the situation--isn't it true that if you have a spouse in Colombia, let us say, that spouse would go to the U.S. consulate on Colombia and would present a marriage certificate or some document that virtually every nation in the…
The President canceled immediately the storage site at Yucca. He announced a 2-year, blue ribbon study on recycling. Those are major changes, both of which are retrograde direction for most of us.
It's to me, much more important that we replace that liquid fuel that goes in our vehicles because 60 percent of it is imported.
I think you're going to continue to hear from the Congress and Democrats as well as Republicans about our view on that.
I do think there is a tendency for institutions like that to sort of settle into their own pace.
So in terms of what's really important for our environment I think that the nuclear meets that test and should be given-- whether you call it a renewable or not--should be given the same incentives that we might give to other sources.
The Wall Street Journal, on June 2, has an article that the U.S. and Russia talks appear headed for a framework agreement by July 6, and a final treaty by December.
We incur more risk each year as the stockpile ages, crucial skills erode, and historic underground test data becomes less relevant.
I am sure you can get a lot more productive work out of him than you were able to get out of me.
It's on a fast track. I would just note that there's no reason that that has to be done this year.
The administration is determined to reach this treaty, for reasons that baffle me.
I remember we cut the ICBM force from 500 to 450. Part of the agreement to do that was that we needed those launches for testing.
I think that is a real way to help them, because some of them move back and forth, and some just ship money back home to strengthen those cartels.
I think you are to be commended for that. I think that has been an important part of the confidence we have in that system.
If that goes forward, which I'm not comfortable with, I think it puts an even greater requirement that we have enough missiles that we have tested over the years.
Well, that is what they have been saying for 20 years, everyone that sat in that chair, wouldn't you say, Senator Specter?
I have believed that we can make the border a lawful place of entry into the United States, that we could eliminate lawlessness.
I have been saying that for some time and not been using divisive rhetoric to say that nothing has been done.





