Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 28, 1996
For example, if the threat to Taiwan is increasing, defensive arm sales should go up. They should not be arbitrarily limited by the bucket. Prior administrations have followed this principle in practice, such as selling F-16's to Taiwan, even though they were outside the dollar limits of the bucket. It was a matter of convenience. We wanted to do it, so we found a way to do it. I do not see why the administration is objecting to this provision, because it is consistent with current practice. I would also remind my colleagues that the identical language passed out of the Foreign Relations Committee in 1994 on a 20-0 vote when I was a member of that committee. Mr. President, I again find it incredible that the administration would issue this veto threat over a provision that was intended merely to restate reality: The law of the land takes precedence over a statement of policy. I do not think you could find one constitutional scholar who would disagree with that proposition. Secretary of State Christopher, in correspondence with me in 1994, acknowledged that it was the administration's position, as it was of previous administrations, that the Taiwan Relations Act as a public law takes legal precedence over the 1982 joint United States-China communique, an Executive communication that was never, as I said, ratified by Congress. Mr. President, I have that letter from Secretary of State Christopher.…
Said by
Lisa Murkowski
Republican · Alaska

Editor's note · Context

Discussing U.S. arms sales to Taiwan and the legal precedence of the Taiwan Relations Act.

Share

More from Lisa Murkowski

Aug 7, 2026

Ensuring the safety of Afghan nationals who bravely fought side by side with U.S. Armed Forces against the Taliban is not only a moral obligation, but also extends to our national security interests.

coons.senate.gov
Aug 7, 2026

I have had numerous constructive meetings with Mr. Blanche and he comes across as decent and capable.

theguardian.com
Jul 23, 2026

I look at the War Powers Resolution, and it’s not ambiguous. It requires the president to terminate hostilities within 60 days absent congressional authorization.

washingtonexaminer.com
Aug 21, 2026

I join Alaskans in condolences as we learn of the plane crash in Cape Newenham today.

theguardian.com

Other voices in this conversation