I suggested that S. 1936 was the answer to nuclear waste and that the editorial page of the Washington Post was the answer to parakeet waste. I would not insult parakeets by suggesting that would be a good use of the letter from the Administrator of the EPA or the Chair of the CEQ. The statements made in these letters are inaccurate and simply the shrill hysteria of those who believe that if you repeat a lie often enough, someone might believe you. The administration, sadly, has demonstrated that they are incapable or unwilling to address this issue, and have now resorted to misstatement, mischaracterization, and distortion to prevent Congress from exercising the leadership the administration has abandoned. Far from being an assault on our environmental laws, this legislation reaffirms our commitment to the environment, and the health and safety of the American people.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about nuclear waste legislation during Senate debate.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
This is more good news for King Cove and all who care about the health, safety, and wellbeing of the hundreds of people who live there.
The National Science Foundation’s decision to leave the Ocean Observatories Initiative’s buoys in place is a massive win for coastal communities and fishermen around the country.
“I take issue with the handling of the release of the Epstein files; the sweeping immunity protections granted to the President, his family, and their businesses; the statements that have been made to anti-abortion groups; and the repeated…
“The country needs an Attorney General who will check the worst impulses of this administration,”





