in responding, the examples I cited are beyond the control of the Senate, beyond the control of the consumer groups. It is just a world market that dictates, when somebody chooses to reduce the supply. As we increase our dependence on the Middle East, on OPEC, we increase our vulnerability. The other example I cited, our interest in stimulating renewables, does not come without a cost. I suggest to the majority as we look at the creation of this Commission--which as I understand would have an authorization of about $400,000, with no staff and no specific definition of powers--see if we can jointly work together and perhaps with the Comptroller General or others undertake this study. If it is not feasible, I will not reject the amendment necessarily. I am just a little sensitive to expanding bureaucracies. If the Senator allows us to work together, maybe we can work out something.
On the recordApril 10, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of energy dependence and the creation of a new Commission.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
Aug 7, 2026
In Alaska, supporting our military services takes an all-hands-on-deck approach. We’ve seen firsthand how IGSAs benefit both military installations and local communities by combining resources for critical functions: everything from…
Jul 17, 2026
The recent lease sale results were not surprising, given the acreage already leased and the continued partisan push against responsible development.
Aug 7, 2026
This bill will break down barriers to treatment while accelerating the research and development of therapies for people living with ALS.
Aug 7, 2026
I have had numerous constructive meetings with Mr. Blanche and he comes across as decent and capable.





