we have a dilemma where we recognize that one individual, who has repeatedly defied the will of the international community, almost certainly has control over a concentration of weapons of mass destruction. We have already seen this individual's willingness to use these weapons against his own people and against Iranian forces during the Iran-Iraq war. So the question is, is it inevitable that sooner or later Saddam Hussein will again use weapons of mass destruction, and if so, against whom? There is concern that if the United States and her allies use force against Iraq, Saddam will attempt to use his weapons of mass destruction in order to remain in power. It is a legitimate concern and one that must not be taken lightly. But I ask my colleagues, if we are hesitant now, how hesitant will we be when Saddam Hussein possesses a nuclear capability? And what will Saddam do when he knows we are unwilling to take action? We have seen Saddam's willingness to invade his neighbors--Iran and Kuwait. How much farther would Saddam have gone had he not been stopped by U.S.-led coalition forces? In 1981, Israeli aircraft destroyed an Iraqi military reactor capable of producing nuclear weapons in a surprise, preemptive strike. Israel faced tremendous criticism from the world, but a decade later, during the gulf war, allied forces did not face a nuclear weapon capability from Iraq.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the threat posed by Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
The country needs an Attorney General who will check the worst impulses of this administration. I hope Mr. Blanche is able to achieve that, if confirmed, but I simply do not have confidence that will be the case.
His extensive experience, professionalism, and judicial temperament make him exceptionally well-qualified for this role.
I will continue working to eliminate this fee permanently so that Alaska’s students are receiving the best education possible, regardless of the outcome of future legal challenges.
The recent lease sale results were not surprising, given the acreage already leased and the continued partisan push against responsible development.





