If we lose a large-diameter pipeline like we have up north that brings crude into the lower 48, what is the economic impact of this?
On the recordFebruary 2, 2011
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Murkowski questions the economic consequences of losing the Trans-Alaska pipeline.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
Jul 21, 2026
I’m glad to once again partner on bipartisan, bi-cameral legislation to develop and implement a unified National Resilience Strategy.
Aug 19, 2026
Kyle brings extensive knowledge of both our state and our court system to the federal bench, having served the District of Alaska as a federal prosecutor and U.S. Magistrate Judge, a position he has held in Alaska for the past five years.
Aug 7, 2026
In Alaska, supporting our military services takes an all-hands-on-deck approach. We’ve seen firsthand how IGSAs benefit both military installations and local communities by combining resources for critical functions: everything from…





