Lisa Murkowski: “it would be inappropriate if I let a day go by when I did not remind my colleagues that there was some significance as…”

“it would be inappropriate if I let a day go by when I did not remind my colleagues that there was some significance as to what we did during the day. Today, there has been a good deal of conversation that, indeed, we could make up by CAFE savings what we would generate by opening ANWR. The Senate, in its action--you notice I did not reflect on wisdom-- basically precluded that, at least for the time being until we go to conference. Also, the issue of the pickup truck, I think, spoke for a majority concerning safety issues. I wouldn't be surprised before we are out of here if we also have an amendment that addresses the Suburbans and SUVs relative to safety. The point I would like to leave with Members today is that we are rapidly diminishing excuses for not opening up ANWR and recognizing that, indeed, the argument that previously prevailed that we can simply make this up on CAFE standards is clearly not in the interest of a majority of the Senate, primarily for the reason of safety associated with Americans, and children in particular, and the advantages of a heavier car moving our children around. As we look at alternatives, I remind my colleagues who are in objection to opening ANWR that they do bear responsibility for coming up with alternatives that are realistic. Certainly from our side, ANWR is realistic. And the probability of a major discovery is second to none from the standpoint of the geology of North America. I think I have said enough for today.…”