I think our national energy security interest is at risk. We fought a war over there to keep Saddam Hussein from invading Kuwait or going into Saudi Arabia. At what point do we compromise our national security? I think if we see fit to fight a war over it, it is pretty important. As the Department of Energy predicts, in the year 2006 or 2007, we will be in the high 60s, 60-some-odd-percent dependent on imports. We have tremendous reserves in the Gulf of Mexico. We have reserves in the overthrust belt in my State of Alaska and tremendous resources of natural gas in Mississippi and Alabama, Texas, Louisiana. We have these resources. We have the technology to develop them safely. We have had a difficult time, perhaps, convincing the environmental community that we can make a smaller footprint. We can do a better job. And we have the American ingenuity and commitment to do it, if given the opportunity. Many of these areas have been closed for exploration and development.
On the recordFebruary 26, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing national energy security and the need for resource development.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
Aug 21, 2026
I join Alaskans in condolences as we learn of the plane crash in Cape Newenham today.
Aug 21, 2026
I join Alaskans in offering condolences as we learn of the plane crash in Cape Newenham.
Aug 13, 2026
Environmental DNA is an innovative, cost-effective tool that will give our scientists a clearer picture of our fisheries while expanding survey coverage and reducing costs. This legislation is the product of extensive collaboration with…
Aug 13, 2026
Last week, I raised this issue with Secretary McMahon, and I’m pleased she agreed to expedite the obligation of the funds for the Alaska Native Education Program grants that Congress appropriated earlier this year.





