I am not going anywhere. I want everybody to make sure they understand that clearly from the beginning this whole process was designed--and I don't think we are fooling anybody--to ensure that the committee of jurisdiction did not get a chance to vote on it. An ANWR amendment would have been part of this bill because we had the votes. That is the bottom line. We have gone on from there into this extended synergy, which I do not think is in the best interests of the Senate.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legislative process regarding an ANWR amendment.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
In Alaska, supporting our military services takes an all-hands-on-deck approach. We’ve seen firsthand how IGSAs benefit both military installations and local communities by combining resources for critical functions: everything from…
It's only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.
As the Arctic grows in strategic importance, the United States must continue investing in the research, infrastructure, and expertise needed to strengthen our understanding of this rapidly changing region.
The recent lease sale results were not surprising, given the acreage already leased and the continued partisan push against responsible development.





