I do support Senator Smith's amendment, as we believe it will enable more Indian tribes to build the facilities and to address the inequities currently in the system. We recognize it has been under review, having been looked at for revision for years, but I think it is time to do something to create improvements to the system to get more facilities for the tribes. Now, we recognize that funding is at the crux of this, but Senator Smith's amendment does not mandate that the Secretary create this system. It says if funding is available, that opportunity exists. Furthermore--and I think this goes to the concern many have--that within the current priority system, if there is a change, somehow or other those who have made their way up to the top will somehow be displaced. We understand it doesn't impact the current health care facilities priority system. What we are attempting to do with this amendment is to enhance that system. I appreciate Senator Smith working with the committee, with the tribes, and with our colleagues on this issue.
On the recordFebruary 25, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment regarding the area distribution fund for Indian tribes.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
Aug 13, 2026
Environmental DNA is an innovative, cost-effective tool that will give our scientists a clearer picture of our fisheries while expanding survey coverage and reducing costs. This legislation is the product of extensive collaboration with…
Aug 7, 2026
In Alaska, supporting our military services takes an all-hands-on-deck approach. We’ve seen firsthand how IGSAs benefit both military installations and local communities by combining resources for critical functions: everything from…
Jul 17, 2026
The recent lease sale results were not surprising, given the acreage already leased and the continued partisan push against responsible development.





