I am going to vote for this balanced budget amendment because I believe nothing short of amending the Constitution is going to change our addiction to spending and living beyond our means. I recall back in 1962 the Federal Government's budget reached $100 billion. By 1971, it had doubled to $200 billion. By 1977, it had doubled again. In 1983, the Federal budget topped $800 billion. The budget for next year, fiscal year 1997, will be more than $1.6 trillion. How can we meet our obligation to our seniors, how can we meet the obligation of coming generations if our fiscal house is not in order? We have been spending far in excess of revenues.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a balanced budget amendment during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
This is more good news for King Cove and all who care about the health, safety, and wellbeing of the hundreds of people who live there.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, and we must have a careful understanding of how our young people interact with this groundbreaking technology.
“I am also keenly aware that the Department’s nearly $2-billion dollar slush fund—which likely would have rewarded January 6 protesters—is only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.”
By providing women with the option to voluntarily prevent unplanned pregnancies and to protect themselves from transmission of the virus and have access to clinics, the United States can prevent further deaths of women and the cruel and…





