as I indicated, out of necessity, these organizations have to consume their causes, and Utah wilderness currently is one of their causes. We have seen their efforts in mining reform, just last week in grazing reform, and the week before the forest issue. Now they have turned their efforts to Utah wilderness. I do not mind constructive input. It is invaluable in the development of quality legislation. It is good for everyone, but this type of big business, well-financed campaigns that they establish are really not constructive. It is a case of ``We're going to protect you from yourselves whether it is good for you or not, but we're going to do it at your own expense.'' Mr. President, I think it is time to get real. I would like to chat a little bit about Sterling Forest, because while I support the proposal of my friend from New Jersey, it is not without some exceptions. The purpose of title XVI is to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide funding to the Palisades Interstate Park Commission in order to facilitate the acquisition of the Sterling Forest in New York.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of well-financed campaigns on legislation regarding wilderness and land acquisition.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
I will continue working to eliminate this fee permanently so that Alaska’s students are receiving the best education possible, regardless of the outcome of future legal challenges.
The recent lease sale results were not surprising, given the acreage already leased and the continued partisan push against responsible development.
By providing women with the option to voluntarily prevent unplanned pregnancies and to protect themselves from transmission of the virus and have access to clinics, the United States can prevent further deaths of women and the cruel and…
It doesn’t appear to me that it puts us in that much of a different position than prior to the beginning of the war.





