My concern is whether or not the proposal would really create another study panel to study what has already been studied many times. Quite frankly, we already knew with what price hikes were associated; namely, a shortage. I often find it makes us feel good to bring in consumers and participate in a townhall meeting, but we have to educate the consumers on the factual information because they are the ones who are affected by the results oftentimes. A price hike obviously hits the consumers, and sometimes they are not knowledgeable. I refer back to the first page of the amendment of the Senator from Illinois; (A)1, and I quote: Of whom shall represent consumer groups focusing on energy issues. I gather that would be four members from the congressional appointees. Is that correct?
Lisa Murkowski: “My concern is whether or not the proposal would really create another study panel to study what has already been studied…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a proposal related to consumer representation in energy issues.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
Alaska is praying for those on board, their loved ones, and the team at Security Aviation.
This is an individual that is not only qualified for this position, he is ready to hit the ground running as a U.S. District Court judge.
Alaska is a cornerstone of American defense; investments like this from the Coast Guard are critical as we work to improve infrastructure on bases across the state to maintain our national security.
This unprecedented announcement moves our long-sought Alaska natural gas pipeline closer than ever to construction and operation. South Korea’s commitment to invest $54 billion to build the gasline will deliver significant benefits for…





