If the mechanical treatment of hazardous fuels is less expensive ultimately both monetarily and really environmentally, then paying for the suppression of these large catastrophic fires, why would we not want to use a portion of the FLAME fund to accomplish the work?
Murkowski questions the rationale for not using FLAME funds for hazardous fuels treatment.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
I look at the War Powers Resolution, and it’s not ambiguous. It requires the president to terminate hostilities within 60 days absent congressional authorization.
For 20 years, the Arctic Report Card has helped Alaskans track the profound changes taking place across our state.
It's only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.
I will continue working to eliminate this fee permanently so that Alaska’s students are receiving the best education possible, regardless of the outcome of future legal challenges.
Other voices in this conversation
