Isn't it better from an environmental perspective and certainly for the critical habitat perspective to allow the proposal that we have before us?
Editor's note · Context
Murkowski questions the environmental impact of the current proposal versus the existing plan.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
I look at the War Powers Resolution, and it’s not ambiguous. It requires the president to terminate hostilities within 60 days absent congressional authorization.
“I am also keenly aware that the Department’s nearly $2-billion dollar slush fund—which likely would have rewarded January 6 protesters—is only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.”
This bill will break down barriers to treatment while accelerating the research and development of therapies for people living with ALS.
By providing women with the option to voluntarily prevent unplanned pregnancies and to protect themselves from transmission of the virus and have access to clinics, the United States can prevent further deaths of women and the cruel and…





