Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 11, 1997
At the end of the House debate, many of the parties in opposition to one another found they simply shared a common goal. So after an extended debate, they came together and found what they could agree upon. They cared a great deal about the skyrocketing costs of the Forest Service program, without exception. They agreed then that collaboration and common understanding was necessary to address the problems in a way that would most likely achieve a mutual beneficial solution and it would be better to do that than simply replay the debate. I think that is where we are today, Mr. President. We do not want to replay that debate that unfolded in the House and perhaps would unfold in this body. So Congressman Young has taken the lead from the Speaker of the House of Representatives to work with the conflict resolution center at George Mason University to schedule an all-day workshop with interested Congressmen to review these issues and find where some common ground and consensus could be found. And this is the issue in mind, the Forest Service's Purchaser Credit Road Construction Program. Congressman Young is inviting me and other interested Senators to the workshop. I will support the House effort and urge Members here to do likewise. I do not believe that we can make sound public policy decisions when we disagree on basic facts associated with the issues that come to the Senate floor. This particular issue is ripe for that kind of exposure.
Said by
Lisa Murkowski
Republican · Alaska

Editor's note · Context

Discussing collaboration on the Forest Service's Purchaser Credit Road Construction Program.

Share

More from Lisa Murkowski

Aug 2, 2026

By providing women with the option to voluntarily prevent unplanned pregnancies and to protect themselves from transmission of the virus and have access to clinics, the United States can prevent further deaths of women and the cruel and…

foxnews.com
Aug 7, 2026

“I am also keenly aware that the Department’s nearly $2-billion dollar slush fund—which likely would have rewarded January 6 protesters—is only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.”

sourcenm.com
Jun 20, 2026

It’s tough to say that that the agreement is one that leaves Iran in a worse place, and the United States in a better place.

vox.com
Aug 8, 2026

It's only off the table because this nomination is pending and the Senate has leverage.

huffpost.com

Other voices in this conversation