There is no question, Mr. President, that we all want to see regulatory reform legislation passed by this Congress for two very, very important reasons. They are simply fairness and common sense. As chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, we passed out a bill that would accomplish fairness and common sense, and in so doing address corrections needed in our regulatory process. We passed a bill that was easily understood. And, as a consequence, we find ourselves immersed now in almost a legal discussion of various types of binding conditions associated with what was generally understood to be a high degree of frustration among the public, a public which was frustrated over policies of the Environmental Protection Agency such as the one that occurred in the largest city of Alaska, Anchorage, AK, where the city was notified that the water that accumulated after rains in the drains that ordinarily went out in Cook Inlet for disposal.
Lisa Murkowski: “There is no question, Mr. President, that we all want to see regulatory reform legislation passed by this Congress for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for regulatory reform legislation and public frustration with EPA policies.
Share
More from Lisa Murkowski
In rural Alaska, you have to improvise. That’s why I’m always interested in innovations that help our communities adapt to the realities on the ground.
I have had numerous constructive meetings with Mr. Blanche and he comes across as decent and capable.
I take issue with the handling of the release of the Epstein files; the sweeping immunity protections granted to the President, his family, and their businesses; the statements that have been made to anti-abortion groups; and the repeated…
For the past 180 years, the Smithsonian Institution has been committed to sharing objective historical evidence through research and education, not political narratives.





