I am curious to know why the Senator from New Hampshire would have reason to believe that the process of full accountability and the resolution of discrepancies in evidence--which the Senator from Alaska admits exist--would necessarily cease. Is there any reason to believe that progress would not continue and, in fact, lead to a greater degree of satisfaction to the questions the Senator is legitimately bringing up?
Senator Murkowski questions the belief that accountability processes will stop.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
Well, how could one object and suggest that activities by a special committee would somehow distract from the special counsel's obligation when, as we have discussed, we have had both committee hearings and special counsel under Watergate…
The question is, I do not know whether the floor manager was invited to the dinner that the Senator from Maine has gone to, but the Senator from Alaska was invited to that dinner and, in the interest of full disclosure, rejected the…
I believe these two pieces of legislation are in the best interest of the native corporations, the Alaska communities where the watersheds are located, and the Federal government.
I appreciate the spirit under which the chairman took my remarks and look forward to some enlightenment from the regulators.
Other voices in this conversation
