I am curious to know why the Senator from New Hampshire would have reason to believe that the process of full accountability and the resolution of discrepancies in evidence--which the Senator from Alaska admits exist--would necessarily cease. Is there any reason to believe that progress would not continue and, in fact, lead to a greater degree of satisfaction to the questions the Senator is legitimately bringing up?
Senator Murkowski questions the belief that accountability processes will stop.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
Government, business, and industry in our country spent approximately $115 billion for pollution control in 1990, and it is estimated that the figure will increase to $185 billion per year--that is 2.3 percent of our gross national…
I rise this morning to speak about a particular provision of that bill, section 531. Section 531 is an important statement of United States policy toward our friends in Taiwan. Madam President, back in July of last year, I added an…
Mr. President, I want to thank my colleague, Senator Simpson, for including my language in the Republican substitute aimed at promoting industrial competitiveness and economic growth through Federal regulatory reform. Both sides recognize…
I would ask my good friend from New Jersey, since he obviously is an expert and has attended the Jake Garn ski event on many occasions, why it took him so long to find out it was not a worthwhile event?
Other voices in this conversation
