So those who would vote against that would have to explain to the public why they felt it was inappropriate that the Senate proceed to authorize the hearing process through whatever committee structure it so designated. What could possibly be a reasonable explanation that one could give his or her constituents for voting against your amendment?
Discussing the importance of authorizing the hearing process during Senate debate.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
Well, how could one object and suggest that activities by a special committee would somehow distract from the special counsel's obligation when, as we have discussed, we have had both committee hearings and special counsel under Watergate…
I was prepared to offer an amendment concerning private property rights relative to the application of S. 21 and what it does and how it threatens private property. However, with regard to S. 21, the California Desert Protection Act, there…
Regarding the amendment offered by Senator Bennett concerning the backlog of land acquisitions facing the Department of the Interior, this amendment is not only responsible in its effort to address a responsibility that we all share, but…
living conditions that simply should not exist in the United States of America
Other voices in this conversation
