Mr. Chairman, I just in closing would like to thank the gentleman from Michigan. He was the father of the Refuge Act as far as this Congress goes and what occurred in the past. He has been very supportive. His staff has been extremely supportive. But more than that, John Dingell has been a true sportsman all through the career I have known him. He has gone to Alaska. He has participated in Alaska sporting activities. He has seen what can be done and what should be done, and it is truly a conservation award that he should be receiving with this legislation. What we have done here today is trying to improve the Act to make sure that we gain that support for a bill that has worked very well in the past, a position that can be worked well in the future. This working together can work for the conservation and for the sportsmen of America. Mr. Chairman, today we are considering a substitute for H.R. 1675, the National Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act of 1996.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the National Wildlife Refuge Improvement Act and acknowledging John Dingell's contributions.
Share
More from Don Young
We can help address the need for emergency food bank support by providing an additional $900 million for food purchases through TEFAP.
More broadly, this sequence of events starkly illustrates why we believe fishery management plans should be developed in-region through a transparent and robust review process rather than through an outside, centralized body.
We have learned firsthand that resource development and protection of the environment are not mutually exclusive goals.
What good are two members of the council--although their being native, what will it help you if you don't have the authority to make decisions on the council?





