I want to suggest two things. One is, I know this county; I was raised just about 75 miles above it. It was one of the larger refinery areas that refined oil. They have lost a lot of those refineries. They have 2 major refineries left, and I will be right up front with everybody, they happen to refine Alaskan oil. That gasoline that is produced is really burned in the State of the gentlewoman that is offering this amendment. If we think gas prices are high now, we should just try driving those refineries out of that area. It does not increase the amount of money for California. It does allow monies for this area; it is heavily impacted. ... I believe that the area which is identified in this amendment is an area that is highly intensified by refineries and should get some of this impact money. Now, as far as California having a surplus of $3 billion, I have heard this over and over and over again, States having surpluses. Are we going to condemn the States that have surpluses because they have managed their money well?
On the recordMay 10, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of refinery closures and state funding during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Don Young
Jul 14, 2022
We therefore firmly believe that a 45-day comment period will allow all stakeholders and the general public more than enough time to review the SEIS and provide meaningful comment.
Nov 15, 2021
More broadly, this sequence of events starkly illustrates why we believe fishery management plans should be developed in-region through a transparent and robust review process rather than through an outside, centralized body.
Mar 7, 2022
With all due respects, in Alaska, the Park Service does not have a good reputation with Alaska Native tribes.
Mar 7, 2022
Let them have the opportunity for jobs and the opportunity to present their point of view.





