I must oppose his amendment, though, because the Gilchrest bill implements the Panama Declaration, as discussed in general debate, which locks into place binding conservation management measures for dolphin and other marine life. This bill is supported, as has been said before, by five environmental organizations, the American Tunaboat Owners, the National Fisheries Institute, the Seafarers' International Union, the California Federation of Labor, the United Industrial Workers, the American Sportfishing Association, and the Clinton administration, although that gives me some reservation. Mr. Chairman, H.R. 2823 recognizes the international voluntary compliance with the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission's dolphin conservation program, which has been in place for the past 4 years. This bill incorporates provisions into U.S. law to continue the international cooperation and compliance. Over the last couple of months, Mr. Gilchrest has worked to address the concerns of the opponents to H.R. 2823. However, the definition of dolphin-safe has kept the two sides from reaching an agreement.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to dolphin conservation during a discussion on fisheries legislation.
Share
More from Don Young
The facts and data do not support this. In the North Pacific, bycatch has been on the agenda at nearly every meeting since I began working in the Council process in 2015.
When the tribe asked Congressman Don Young to cosponsor the bill years ago, he looked me in the eye and said, so the landowners get resolved, the tribe still has to prove its case, are you sure that is what you want? I said, yes, sir, it…
I believe the councils can actually manage the fish better than a centralized political figure.
More broadly, this sequence of events starkly illustrates why we believe fishery management plans should be developed in-region through a transparent and robust review process rather than through an outside, centralized body.





