I cannot specifically answer the gentleman's question at this time. It is my intent to make sure the vessels, whatever vessels operate in these waters, will be under Coast Guard jurisdiction, and I think that is what the intent of this is. It is my intent, personally, as chairman. The gentleman brings up a point about a Customs ruling that can be changed. I do not intend to do anything. As my colleague knows, I support the Jones Act equally as he does, and we will be reviewing this, and I am willing to work with the gentleman as this legislation goes forward to see if we cannot make sure that his and my ideas are implemented because I am not going to get involved right now with the trips to nowhere because I do not know the effect of this legislation on those activities at this time.
Don Young: “I cannot specifically answer the gentleman's question at this time. It is my intent to make sure the vessels, whatever…”
On the recordNovember 5, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the jurisdiction of vessels and the Jones Act during legislative proceedings.
Share
More from Don Young
Jul 14, 2022
We therefore firmly believe that a 45-day comment period will allow all stakeholders and the general public more than enough time to review the SEIS and provide meaningful comment.
Mar 22, 2023
The Endangered Species Act, we should celebrate when these species get to the numbers that we need, so we can have Minnesota manage these wolves.
Nov 28, 2023
We have learned firsthand that resource development and protection of the environment are not mutually exclusive goals.
Nov 28, 2023
We see the Biden administration utilizing every bureaucratic device at its disposal in its quixotic quest to forestall natural resource development across Alaska.





