Again, the gentleman from Michigan is absolutely correct. The exclusion of reserved water rights in the definition section of H.R. 1675 is intended to impose a limitation on the geographic boundaries of individual refuges and is not intended to override the disclaimer protecting existing water rights in section 8(a) of this bill.
Don Young: “Again, the gentleman from Michigan is absolutely correct. The exclusion of reserved water rights in the definition…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of H.R. 1675 regarding water rights.
Share
More from Don Young
We should celebrate when these species get to the numbers that we need, so we can have Minnesota manage these wolves.
We see the Biden administration utilizing every bureaucratic device at its disposal in its quixotic quest to forestall natural resource development across Alaska.
When the tribe asked Congressman Don Young to cosponsor the bill years ago, he looked me in the eye and said, so the landowners get resolved, the tribe still has to prove its case, are you sure that is what you want? I said, yes, sir, it…
The Endangered Species Act, we should celebrate when these species get to the numbers that we need, so we can have Minnesota manage these wolves.





