Again, the gentleman from Michigan is absolutely correct. The exclusion of reserved water rights in the definition section of H.R. 1675 is intended to impose a limitation on the geographic boundaries of individual refuges and is not intended to override the disclaimer protecting existing water rights in section 8(a) of this bill.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of H.R. 1675 regarding water rights.
Share
More from Don Young
We therefore firmly believe that a 45-day comment period will allow all stakeholders and the general public more than enough time to review the SEIS and provide meaningful comment.
the Endangered Species Act, we should celebrate when these species get to the numbers that we need, so we can have Minnesota manage these wolves.
More broadly, this sequence of events starkly illustrates why we believe fishery management plans should be developed in-region through a transparent and robust review process rather than through an outside, centralized body.
we should celebrate when these species get to the numbers that we need, so we can have Minnesota manage these wolves.





