On the recordJune 25, 2008
I have listened very intently to this debate. The thing that bothers me the most is that this is about competition. That's all it is. Let's face it. It's competition. I'm a little disturbed that the casinos in Detroit that are owned by Indian tribes now are objecting to their brethren, because it's about competition. We have been over this time and time again. This is not a new bill. This is an attempt to settle a land claim by those who own land and who no longer have title of it because of a court ruling. This is not just about casinos. And by the way, to the chairman of the Judiciary, I did mention 'casinos' in my statement. It's there, I want you people to understand, and I did mention 'gaming,' but I did say 'casinos,' too. I'm not trying to hide anything. This is their prerogative under IGRA to have the title to this land. This land was not voluntarily given away. This land was taken. The State of Michigan said it was taken. The courts have said it was taken. These tribes have a legal title to this land. And, until they get that land, the people who now have homes, who have stores that have been inherited from their parents, that title is not theirs. But we have those in Detroit and those interests from outside of Michigan that don't want any more competition. Competition, apparently, is bad for the American way. I think it's good.
Source
govinfo.gov




