I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriations bill and therefore violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: An amendment to a general appropriations bill shall not be in order if changing existing law. The amendment gives affirmative direction in effect. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does another Member wish to be heard on the point of order?
Don Young: “I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in…”
Share
More from Don Young
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss Willow with you at any time, and further to facilitate your meeting with the groups above to hear from them directly.
When the tribe asked Congressman Don Young to cosponsor the bill years ago, he looked me in the eye and said, so the landowners get resolved, the tribe still has to prove its case, are you sure that is what you want? I said, yes, sir, it…
We therefore firmly believe that a 45-day comment period will allow all stakeholders and the general public more than enough time to review the SEIS and provide meaningful comment.
I come before you today to plead on behalf of all Alaskans for relief from the inimical policies imposed by the current Administration.





