On the recordApril 7, 2015
Instead, we are here to talk about the proposed rule and regulations of waters that I believe Congress never intended to be jurisdictional under the act.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Dan Sullivan argues that the proposed rule expands federal jurisdiction beyond Congressional intent.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
Oct 8, 2025
I want to let people know back home that means that that bill, the ARTIST bill that we have been trying to get moved for a long time, just passed the U.S. Senate. So I want to thank my colleague from California, my friend from California…
Oct 30, 2025
we are getting ready to vote on my CRA, S.J. Res. 80. And, by the away, I appreciated the strong bipartisan vote yesterday to get on this bill. This is a really important resolution for our country, for my State, for the Native people, and…
Feb 20, 2025
I ask for the yeas and nays. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there a sufficient second? There appears to be a sufficient second. The clerk will call the roll. The legislative clerk called the roll. The result was announced--yeas 51, nays 49, as…
Apr 4, 2025
Talk about a ruse. This is the worst kind of partisanship, using people's healthcare to fearmonger. We should all want to weed out waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid and Medicare, and we must keep these programs going. The PRESIDING…
Other voices in this conversation
