On the recordFebruary 10, 2015
EPA's interpretation is also unreasonable because it would bring about an enormous transformative expansion of EPA's regulatory authority without clean congressional authorization.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Senator Sullivan cites a Supreme Court ruling on EPA's regulatory authority.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
Apr 4, 2025
We should do both. I ask my colleagues to vote for this amendment. And all my colleagues who voted for this amendment in 2017 should simply vote for it again. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Oregon.
Mar 27, 2025
like all of us, last week, I was back home in my great State--the great State of Alaska. And, actually, I try to be home every weekend, even when we are in session. But this trip back home was particularly important because I was in…
Apr 4, 2025
I call up my amendment No. 2035 and ask that it be reported by number. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report. The legislative clerk read as follows: The Senator from Alaska [Mr. Sullivan] proposes an amendment numbered 2035 to…
Oct 8, 2025
I want to let people know back home that means that that bill, the ARTIST bill that we have been trying to get moved for a long time, just passed the U.S. Senate. So I want to thank my colleague from California, my friend from California…
Other voices in this conversation
