So my view is, particularly given what you're talking about, that despite having had the Supreme Court just a year ago reprimand the EPA for taking over with regard to regulatory authority that they did not have, because there was not a clear instance of the Congress granting them that authority, that they're ignoring the Supreme Court, who issued this very important ruling just a year ago, that the State of Alaska was very involved with, and they're doing it again: They're issuing a regulation that has significant impact over the economy of the United States, the economy of Alaska, without congressional authorization.
Dan Sullivan: “So my view is, particularly given what you're talking about, that despite having had the Supreme Court just a year ago…”
Editor's note · Context
Sullivan criticizes the EPA for ignoring a Supreme Court ruling on regulatory authority.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
There is also what we call the VOICE of the Inupiat, another group similarly situated--all Alaska Natives, all from this area. They were established to speak with a unified voice for the Native people on the North Slope, to preserve the…
Maybe the minority leader will explain why he is objecting given that we just laid out very cogent, strong reasons that we need to move forward on confirming the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff right now. It is a very dangerous…
I have been working this issue for 9 months. I have been working this issue all weekend.
I have every right to run for whatever office I’m qualified for, and I’m qualified for this office.





