I think that violates the tenth amendment or any other aspect of the Clean Water Act.
Dan Sullivan: “I think that violates the tenth amendment or any other aspect of the Clean Water Act.”
Editor's note · Context
Sullivan argues that federal requirements for state road mitigation violate state rights.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
Maybe the minority leader will explain why he is objecting given that we just laid out very cogent, strong reasons that we need to move forward on confirming the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff right now. It is a very dangerous…
I have a resolution that I am looking forward to passing here on the Senate floor. I am pretty sure no one is going to object to it, but we will see in a minute. Before I begin, I want to do a huge shout-out and congratulations to Alaska's…
I am legitimately upset, and I don't treat anyone else like you, and I certainly don't treat you, because I respect you, but I would never treat you like this.
Next time someone is legislating on my State specifically, it shouldn't be your staff.





