Is it not a bit ironic? Because is it not part of the reason to have the Council put together that you want to choose members who actually are involved in the industry, and involved in fisheries issues, and know a lot about it, which raises the issue of recusal even though it also raises the issue of knowledge?
Sullivan questions the irony of recusals in a council meant for knowledgeable industry members.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
I am coming down to the Senate floor for the second time in about a month to try to pass a really important bill for some really heroic constituents of mine, Alaskan Native Vietnam veterans, and I am going to explain this bill a little…
what I really want to do is do something that I think is probably the best highlight of Thursday speeches in the Senate--I think the pages all certainly agree; they are all nodding-- for the people watching across America. It is the…
I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there an objection?
I hope we can move to the next bill that, to be honest, should be even easier because the bill I am going to try to pass right now passed the U.S. Senate in December, unanimously. It already passed, so this should be a no-brainer. I hope…
Other voices in this conversation
