On the recordSeptember 28, 2015
The EPA's interpretation is unreasonable because it would bring about an enormous transformative expansion of the EPA's regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Sullivan critiques the EPA's broad regulatory interpretation lacking congressional authorization.
Share
More from Dan Sullivan
Oct 30, 2025
we are getting ready to vote on my CRA, S.J. Res. 80. And, by the away, I appreciated the strong bipartisan vote yesterday to get on this bill. This is a really important resolution for our country, for my State, for the Native people, and…
Apr 10, 2025
maybe the minority leader will explain why he is objecting given that we just laid out very cogent, strong reasons that we need to move forward on confirming the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff right now. It is a very dangerous…
Nov 7, 2025
Imagine that--we want to pay our military during a shutdown, including the Coast Guard. Senator Johnson came to me and said: Dan, I have a broader bill. Let's pay everybody who is required to work to keep us safe in America. I said: Great…
Mar 22, 2026
I certainly hope we can continue to move forward in a good-faith manner to fund Homeland Security and get the reforms and compromise that have been demanded on both sides. I am hopeful we can get there. But one way we can show that…
Other voices in this conversation
