If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?
Edmund Burke: “If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke challenges the idea of an elective monarchy by demonstrating how it would invalidate fundamental English laws established by non-elected kings.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
So far is it from being true that we acquired a right by the Revolution to elect our kings, that, if we had possessed it before, the English nation did at that time most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their…
A state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation.
Though a king may abdicate for his own person, he cannot abdicate for the monarchy.
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.





