It is the reason that we have issues about what we do to preserve workplace safety.

The days are over when banks could get CRA credit for a church banquet and a banner on the wall.

We need to update this regulation, update the law, in fact, if we are able, to ensure that banking is available to people on their terms.

regulatory complexity favors large, established companies who can better absorb new compliance costs.

So we expect that our FDA is looking at our food supply and our pharmaceutical supplies to ensure their safety. Is that correct?

The FDA approval process can tend to be politicized.

It is even more concerning that people have known about these carcinogens in the products and have put them on store shelves regardless.

I support the Second Amendment... But I also believe that there can be and must be reasonable regulation.

It's going to be very hard for them to operate if they don't know what the rules of the road are.

This rule will provide the clarity and certainty businesses and industry need about which waters are protected by the Clean Water Act.

The EPA has proposed a rule that will increase its regulatory authority far beyond current policy.

It would allow the EPA almost unconstrained access to regulate and burden landowners with endless environmental studies.

The regulatory system must protect public health, welfare, safety, and our environment while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation.

Today’s proposed rule emphasizes the importance of flexibility and pragmatism.

American consumers can't wait any longer for clear rules of the road that ensure their personal information is safe online.

That is the judgment of our Nuclear Regulatory Commission and many other experts.

Agencies shall carry out the provisions of this memorandum to the extent permitted by law and consistent with their statutory and regulatory authorities and their enforcement mechanisms.

We're holding insurance companies accountable in other ways as well.