We're facing an inflection point in history. One of those moments where the decisions we make today are going to determine the future for decades to come.
On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
20,000+·quotes on file
As a matter of history, we have heard that this decision reverses over four decades of clean water implementation.
I feel very strongly that we need to value the science.
One of the things that Senator Capito and I try to do is develop consensus on difficult issues.
Through Sackett, the Supreme Court has weakened one of our bedrock environmental laws, and harms will be felt nationwide.
I think we have been locked in a bit of a cycle and not thinking as creatively as we can in the rulemaking process.
I am going to be looking for consensus and implementing a lot of stuff that we have authored and enacted.
We have been remarkably successful, not entirely successful, remarkably successful on a wide range of issues.
I do think that we are locked in a circular pattern here, and that one, we need to be more thoughtful in terms of rulemaking.
I think these concerns miss the point. We just had a radical, I think, a sweeping reduction in water protections.
I know we can't pass laws to tell water how to flow.
I do also want to emphasize that back in 1972, the staff was worried and the Senators were worried about federalism and constitutional limitations on their authority.
I also disagree that Sackett means we have lost a lot of authority.
Today, I believe the Supreme Court got it wrong, with all due respect, in the Sackett decision.
I think it is a moral issue, and it is something that we have a moral imperative to make sure we get it right.
As a matter of impacts, we have heard that the loss of protections for over half of our Nation's remaining wetlands and millions of miles of streams will lead to more flooding, more polluted waters, and unfortunately, harm to wildlife.
I think that is really important that we understand, and we dig a little deeper.