On the recordOctober 17, 2023
As a matter of history, we have heard that this decision reverses over four decades of clean water implementation.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Carper highlights the historical significance of the Supreme Court's decision on clean water.
Share
More from Tom Carper
Dec 12, 2024
before we vote this afternoon, I want to rise to express my strong support for the nomination of Matthew James Marzano to serve as a member of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Today there is a critical need for nuclear power in our…
Dec 18, 2024
on behalf of the majority leader, I ask the Chair to execute the order of December 12 with respect to the House message to accompany S. 4367. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the previous order, the Chair lays before the Senate the following…
Jun 18, 2024
The ADVANCE Act has no effect on the current authorities of the Commission, the Secretaries of Energy, State, or any other Federal Agency involved in the export of nuclear technology. The notification in section 103 exists in addition to…
Jun 18, 2024
Yes. To assist Congress in understanding the extent and nature of exports to countries that have not ratified International Atomic Energy Agency safety and security protocols, the Commission must notify Congress if the NRC determines that…
Other voices in this conversation
