But you are making money on those products. I mean, according to your balance sheet, you are making money so, I mean, why would you need an increase?
On the public record
All Quotes
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
14,000+·quotes on file
I am willing to invest the political capital. We have a number of stakeholders that are here as we are looking to truly save the Postal Service as we know it.
If she is not happy, I am not happy, and I am saying that from the other side of the aisle, okay?
We need a real transparency as it relates to your financials and how we can look at this because there seems to be an indication that that is totally in the purview of the PRC and bypassing Congress.
The only thing that the chair recognizes is a CBO analysis is the only entity that makes a weatherman's forecast look good.
I do stand here very much in support of maintaining, sustaining, resurrecting, and otherwise making sure the Postal Service stays alive for a very, very long time and continues to serve the American public.
My concern is is that in 2002 I believe it was the USPS attributed 4 percent of its delivery cost to packages, competitive products, partial.
It's a popular topic these days, and with $1.3 trillion outstanding, it's clear why it is.
Couldn't this money and time be better spent on serving students?
It's time for the Federal Government to get out of the way.
Under the First Amendment, we want to make sure that everybody's opportunity to protest, to speak out on things they believe in, is always protected.
It is time that our friends are recognized as our friends and our enemies are recognized as our enemies.
I am tired of every single time we have an anti-U.S., anti-Israel U.N. consistently voting against us when we are the main funder.
I am not as optimistic as the gentleman from New York in terms of reform ever happening in the U.N. without a leverage point.
Democrats will not stand idly by while we are forced to consider proposals that will restrict access to health care.
Now Republicans want to turn back the clock. They want to put insurance companies back in charge of health care.
This appears to be another hearing to discuss Republican plans to change the healthcare system and reduce people's access to care and to make health care more expensive.