Certainly a great deal that we`re going to after 50 years decide a woman does not have a right to choose. It would mean that every other decision, we made the notion of privacy is thrown into question.

What are the next things that are going to be attacked? Because this MAGA crowd is really the most extreme political organization that has existed in American history -- in recent American history.

The idea of reporting out something this expansive, this beneficial, again, with a bipartisan unanimous vote, is just, for me, it is very rewarding and satisfying.

It is important that we need to not just address the symptoms of these problems, but also the root causes.

the majority of the court on the verge of issuing the first Supreme Court decision in history that removes a constitutional right, and that opinion will be opposed by 70 percent of Americans.

I want to thank Senator Cardin, him and his team, and Senator Cramer, to you and your team in your role as Ranking Member on the Subcommittee.

The yeas are, say that again, 20 to zero? I like that.

This is about a lot more than abortion. The idea that somehow there is an inherent right -- that there is no right of privacy, what are the next things that are going to be attacked? Because this MAGA crowd is really the most extreme…

I am pretty excited on this May 4th about our bipartisan package.

This MAGA crowd is really the most extreme political organization that`s existed.

I want to take a moment to thank Senators Capito, Cardin, Cramer, that is a lot of Cs, other members of our Committee, and our staffs as well for the hard work in getting this legislation ready for consideration today.

may the fourth and the force be with you.

Well, we are united. We are 20 to zero. Twenty yeas, zero nays, and the legislation is favorably reported.

If the rationale of the decision as release were to be sustained, a whole range of rights are in question a while range of rights, and the idea we`re letting the states make those decisions, localities decision would be a fundamental shift…

It concerns me a great deal that we`re going to, after 50 years, decide a woman does not have a right to choose within the limits of the Supreme Court decision in Casey.

I think the codification of Roe makes a lot of sense.

If this decision holds, it is really quite a radical decision. Does this mean that in Florida, they can decide they're going to pass a law saying that same sex marriage is not permissible? It's against the law in Florida. So there's a…

I think we can and should do more to actively encourage effective outreach domestically.