Richard Cordray: “Anything less than that is an abdication of the Director's responsibility to the Bureau and its employees.”

I stand by and believe this was a reasonable approach to how to get relief to hundreds of thousands of consumers who were discriminated against under the disparate impact theory that I know some people disagree with, but the Supreme Court…

Disparate impact has been the law of the land for decades. It has been reaffirmed by the Supreme Court.

The fastest growing segment of student loan borrowers is actually older Americans.

[a]rbitration clauses, as they are used today both in the field of consumer finance and more generally, often have been deliberately designed to block Americans from effective means of vindicating their rights.