I think it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the defense, actually admitting and saying that, 'Look, this is not the standard of care that I would have used, and I'm the expert for the defendant.'
Paul Henderson discusses the damaging testimony of the defense's expert witness in the trial.
Share
More from Paul Henderson
Maryland’s housing is expensive mainly because we haven’t built enough homes in the places people want to live.
One of the things that stood out to me that she said was that she believed that when he pulled the trigger of that gun, he believed he was in fear of his life.
Yes. I don't see that coming at this point. With the evidence that's been presented so far, I think the jury, in addition to hearing all of these lapses of judgment... is coming to a place where they can sit in judgment pretty easily and…
I think the prosecution needed to address race, even if that would not have changed the juror's mind.