I thought it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the defense actually admitting and saying that, look, this is not the standard of care that I would have used, and I'm the expert for the defendant.
Paul Henderson: “I thought it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Paul Henderson, a prosecutor, discusses the damaging testimony of a defense expert in a high-profile case.
Share
More from Paul Henderson
Look, here's the thing. And it's very disappointing and challenging. And you know, I believe in the criminal justice system. But I disagree with this verdict.
I think the prosecution needed to address race, even if that would not have changed the juror's mind.
Maryland’s housing is expensive mainly because we haven’t built enough homes in the places people want to live.
I think it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the defense, actually admitting and saying that, 'Look, this is not the standard of care that I would have used, and I'm the…