Neil Gorsuch: “I would agree with you it is highly inappropriate.”

They targeted different kinds of people, did so for different purposes, and operated in different ways.

Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.

As I see it, Mr. Chatrie's Location History data qualifies as his personal property.

That Fourth Amendment test, which the Court invented in 1967, has no basis in the Constitution's text or history.