On the recordJune 18, 2026
Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.
Said by
Neil Gorsuch
Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.
Majority opinion in United States v. Hemani.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
the Court should ditch those precedents, which he says are indefensible in theory and unworkable in practice.
It forces us to reimagine a statute expanding public access to the agency's administrative proceedings into one restricting access.
As I see it, Mr. Chatrie's Location History data qualifies as his personal property.
Tribes are not private organizations within state boundaries . . . Tribes are sovereigns.