Accepting the commission's argument that Texas and Fasken could not seek review of its licensing decision requires us to ignore the full scope of the agency's own licensing proceeding.
Gorsuch critiques the commission's argument limiting judicial review.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
In our times, the jury trial has given way to a conveyor belt of plea bargains.
Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.
Roe versus Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It has been reaffirmed, and the reliance and considerations are important.
Doesn’t it entangle the state tremendously when it has to go into a soup kitchen, send an inspector in, to see how much prayer is going on?