It forces us to reimagine a statute expanding public access to the agency's administrative proceedings into one restricting access.
Editor's note · Context
Gorsuch argues that the ruling limits public access to agency proceedings.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
They targeted different kinds of people, did so for different purposes, and operated in different ways.
Accepting the commission's argument that Texas and Fasken could not seek review of its licensing decision requires us to ignore the full scope of the agency's own licensing proceeding.
I would tell you that Roe versus Wade decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992 and in several other cases.
The Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe vs. Wade that a fetus is not a person. That’s the law of the land. I accept the law of the land.